NLR vs URA overlap - what they share and where they differ
NLR and URA share 49.1% of their weight across 19 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
NLR and URA
49.1%
19 shared positions
NLR
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 25 positions · Jun 30, 2026
Top 10: 61.1%·Holdings of NLR
URA
Global X Uranium ETF
Reported positions cover 99% of the fund, 57 positions · Jul 31, 2026
Top 10: 63.0%·Holdings of URA
Reported positions cover NLR 100%, URA 99% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
URA vs NLR side by side
NLRVanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF
25
stock positions reported to the SEC
35.9% of its weight is in 6 names URA does not hold
URAGlobal X Uranium ETF
57
stock positions reported to the SEC
33.9% of its weight is in 38 names NLR does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Utilities: NLR has 15.5 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| NLR | URA | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | Jun 30, 2026 | Jul 31, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 25 | 57 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 61.1% | 63.0% |
| Largest position | CCJ 8.4% | CCJ 22.2% |
| Held alone | 6 positions, 35.9% | 38 positions, 33.9% |
| Covered by stock positions | 100% | 99% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In NLR | In URA | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| CCJCameco Corp | 8.41% | 22.18% | 8.41% |
| OKLOOklo Inc | 5.22% | 6.09% | 5.22% |
| NXENexGen Energy Ltd | 4.97% | 6.07% | 4.97% |
| UECUranium Energy Corp | 4.99% | 4.81% | 4.81% |
| LEUCentrus Energy Corp | 5.05% | 3.46% | 3.46% |
| PALADIN ENERGY LTD | 4.35% | 3.14% | 3.14% |
| SMRNuScale Power Corp | 4.76% | 3.04% | 3.04% |
| UUUUEnergy Fuels Inc/Canada | 4.67% | 3.03% | 3.03% |
| DNNDenison Mines Corp | 4.77% | 2.73% | 2.73% |
| XEX-Energy Inc | 2.39% | 3.03% | 2.39% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in NLR
Only in URA
Questions people ask
Is NLR the same as URA?
49.1% of their weight sits in the same 19 holdings. NLR also reports CEG, PEG, BWXT, which the other does not. URA also reports SII, JYNT, SBSW, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between NLR and URA measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 100% of NLR and 99% of URA, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, URA or NLR?
NLR reports 25 stock positions and URA reports 57. 35.9% of NLR's weight sits in names URA does not hold, and 33.9% of URA's weight in names NLR does not hold. The ten largest positions are 61.1% of NLR and 63.0% of URA.
How do NLR and URA differ by sector?
The widest gap is Utilities: NLR has 15.5 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.