NOBL vs SPLV overlap - what they share and where they differ
NOBL and SPLV share 25.1% of their weight across 25 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
NOBL and SPLV
25.1%
25 shared positions
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 69 positions · May 31, 2026
Top 10: 16.5%·Holdings of NOBL
SPLV
Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 100 positions · May 31, 2026
Top 10: 12.5%·Holdings of SPLV
Reported positions cover NOBL 100%, SPLV 100% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
SPLV vs NOBL side by side
NOBLProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
69
stock positions reported to the SEC
63.5% of its weight is in 44 names SPLV does not hold
SPLVInvesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF
100
stock positions reported to the SEC
74.6% of its weight is in 75 names NOBL does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Utilities: SPLV has 26.9 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| NOBL | SPLV | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | May 31, 2026 | May 31, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 69 | 100 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 16.5% | 12.5% |
| Largest position | NUE 1.8% | FE 1.3% |
| Held alone | 44 positions, 63.5% | 75 positions, 74.6% |
| Covered by stock positions | 100% | 100% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In NOBL | In SPLV | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| ORealty Income Corp. | 1.40% | 1.19% | 1.19% |
| KOCoca-Cola Co. (The) | 1.55% | 1.18% | 1.18% |
| LINLinde plc | 1.47% | 1.17% | 1.17% |
| MCDMcDonald's Corp. | 1.36% | 1.16% | 1.16% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson | 1.46% | 1.15% | 1.15% |
| ATOAtmos Energy Corp. | 1.36% | 1.14% | 1.14% |
| AFLAflac, Inc. | 1.42% | 1.10% | 1.10% |
| FRTFederal Realty Investment Trust | 1.58% | 1.09% | 1.09% |
| EDConsolidated Edison, Inc. | 1.43% | 1.08% | 1.08% |
| PGProcter & Gamble Co. (The) | 1.48% | 1.07% | 1.07% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in NOBL
Only in SPLV
Questions people ask
Is NOBL the same as SPLV?
25.1% of their weight sits in the same 25 holdings. NOBL also reports NUE, WST, IBM, which the other does not. SPLV also reports FE, L, BRK.A, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between NOBL and SPLV measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 100% of NOBL and 100% of SPLV, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, SPLV or NOBL?
NOBL reports 69 stock positions and SPLV reports 100. 63.5% of NOBL's weight sits in names SPLV does not hold, and 74.6% of SPLV's weight in names NOBL does not hold. The ten largest positions are 16.5% of NOBL and 12.5% of SPLV.
How do NOBL and SPLV differ by sector?
The widest gap is Utilities: SPLV has 26.9 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.