NOBL vs VIG overlap - what they share and where they differ
NOBL and VIG share 21.5% of their weight across 47 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
NOBL and VIG
21.5%
47 shared positions
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 69 positions · May 31, 2026
Top 10: 16.5%·Holdings of NOBL
VIG
VANGUARD DIVIDEND APPRECIATION INDEX FUND
Reported positions cover 99% of the fund, 309 positions · Apr 30, 2026
Top 10: 32.5%·Holdings of VIG
Reported positions cover NOBL 100%, VIG 99% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
VIG vs NOBL side by side
NOBLProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
69
stock positions reported to the SEC
32.2% of its weight is in 22 names VIG does not hold
VIGVANGUARD DIVIDEND APPRECIATION INDEX FUND
309
stock positions reported to the SEC
75.2% of its weight is in 262 names NOBL does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Technology: VIG has 15.4 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| NOBL | VIG | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | May 31, 2026 | Apr 30, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 69 | 309 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 16.5% | 32.5% |
| Largest position | NUE 1.8% | AVGO 5.2% |
| Held alone | 22 positions, 32.2% | 262 positions, 75.2% |
| Covered by stock positions | 100% | 99% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In NOBL | In VIG | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| CATCaterpillar, Inc. | 1.60% | 1.87% | 1.60% |
| ABBVAbbVie, Inc. | 1.56% | 1.68% | 1.56% |
| PGProcter & Gamble Co. (The) | 1.48% | 1.54% | 1.48% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson | 1.46% | 2.49% | 1.46% |
| KOCoca-Cola Co. (The) | 1.55% | 1.37% | 1.37% |
| WMTWalmart, Inc. | 1.31% | 2.60% | 1.31% |
| LINLinde plc | 1.47% | 1.05% | 1.05% |
| PEPPepsiCo, Inc. | 1.36% | 0.98% | 0.98% |
| IBMInternational Business Machines Corp. | 1.71% | 0.97% | 0.97% |
| MCDMcDonald's Corp. | 1.36% | 0.94% | 0.94% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in NOBL
Only in VIG
Questions people ask
Is NOBL the same as VIG?
21.5% of their weight sits in the same 47 holdings. NOBL also reports FRANKLIN RESOURCES, INC., HRL, ESS, which the other does not. VIG also reports AVGO, AAPL, MSFT, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between NOBL and VIG measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 100% of NOBL and 99% of VIG, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, VIG or NOBL?
NOBL reports 69 stock positions and VIG reports 309. 32.2% of NOBL's weight sits in names VIG does not hold, and 75.2% of VIG's weight in names NOBL does not hold. The ten largest positions are 16.5% of NOBL and 32.5% of VIG.
How do NOBL and VIG differ by sector?
The widest gap is Technology: VIG has 15.4 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.