NOBL vs VTV overlap - what they share and where they differ
NOBL and VTV share 18.9% of their weight across 42 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
NOBL and VTV
18.9%
42 shared positions
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 69 positions · May 31, 2026
Top 10: 16.5%·Holdings of NOBL
VTV
VANGUARD VALUE INDEX FUND
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 305 positions · Jun 30, 2026
Top 10: 24.1%·Holdings of VTV
Reported positions cover NOBL 100%, VTV 100% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
VTV vs NOBL side by side
NOBLProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
69
stock positions reported to the SEC
38.5% of its weight is in 27 names VTV does not hold
VTVVANGUARD VALUE INDEX FUND
305
stock positions reported to the SEC
79.0% of its weight is in 263 names NOBL does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Consumer Cyclical: NOBL has 12.9 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| NOBL | VTV | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | May 31, 2026 | Jun 30, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 69 | 305 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 16.5% | 24.1% |
| Largest position | NUE 1.8% | MU 4.9% |
| Held alone | 27 positions, 38.5% | 263 positions, 79.0% |
| Covered by stock positions | 100% | 100% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In NOBL | In VTV | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| CATCaterpillar, Inc. | 1.60% | 1.83% | 1.60% |
| ABBVAbbVie, Inc. | 1.56% | 1.66% | 1.56% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson | 1.46% | 2.29% | 1.46% |
| WMTWalmart, Inc. | 1.31% | 1.86% | 1.31% |
| PGProcter & Gamble Co. (The) | 1.48% | 1.28% | 1.28% |
| CVXChevron Corp. | 1.44% | 1.17% | 1.17% |
| KOCoca-Cola Co. (The) | 1.55% | 1.05% | 1.05% |
| IBMInternational Business Machines Corp. | 1.71% | 0.99% | 0.99% |
| LINLinde plc | 1.47% | 0.90% | 0.90% |
| PEPPepsiCo, Inc. | 1.36% | 0.69% | 0.69% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in NOBL
Only in VTV
Questions people ask
Is NOBL the same as VTV?
18.9% of their weight sits in the same 42 holdings. NOBL also reports WST, FRANKLIN RESOURCES, INC., HRL, which the other does not. VTV also reports MU, BRK.A, JPMORGAN CHASE & CO, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between NOBL and VTV measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 100% of NOBL and 100% of VTV, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, VTV or NOBL?
NOBL reports 69 stock positions and VTV reports 305. 38.5% of NOBL's weight sits in names VTV does not hold, and 79.0% of VTV's weight in names NOBL does not hold. The ten largest positions are 16.5% of NOBL and 24.1% of VTV.
How do NOBL and VTV differ by sector?
The widest gap is Consumer Cyclical: NOBL has 12.9 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.