NOBL vs VYM overlap - what they share and where they differ
NOBL and VYM share 21.7% of their weight across 51 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
NOBL and VYM
21.7%
51 shared positions
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 69 positions · May 31, 2026
Top 10: 16.5%·Holdings of NOBL
VYM
VANGUARD HIGH DIVIDEND YIELD INDEX FUND
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 601 positions · Jul 31, 2026
Top 10: 26.1%·Holdings of VYM
Reported positions cover NOBL 100%, VYM 100% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
VYM vs NOBL side by side
NOBLProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
69
stock positions reported to the SEC
25.5% of its weight is in 18 names VYM does not hold
VYMVANGUARD HIGH DIVIDEND YIELD INDEX FUND
601
stock positions reported to the SEC
75.5% of its weight is in 550 names NOBL does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Consumer Defensive: NOBL has 23.5 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| NOBL | VYM | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | May 31, 2026 | Jul 31, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 69 | 601 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 16.5% | 26.1% |
| Largest position | NUE 1.8% | AVGO 7.4% |
| Held alone | 18 positions, 25.5% | 550 positions, 75.5% |
| Covered by stock positions | 100% | 100% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In NOBL | In VYM | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| ABBVAbbVie, Inc. | 1.56% | 1.80% | 1.56% |
| CATCaterpillar, Inc. | 1.60% | 1.50% | 1.50% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson | 1.46% | 2.51% | 1.46% |
| CVXChevron Corp. | 1.44% | 1.48% | 1.44% |
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 1.44% | 2.63% | 1.44% |
| KOCoca-Cola Co. (The) | 1.55% | 1.38% | 1.38% |
| PGProcter & Gamble Co. (The) | 1.48% | 1.37% | 1.37% |
| LINLinde plc | 1.47% | 0.90% | 0.90% |
| IBMInternational Business Machines Corp. | 1.71% | 0.85% | 0.85% |
| MCDMcDonald's Corp. | 1.36% | 0.78% | 0.78% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in NOBL
Only in VYM
Questions people ask
Is NOBL the same as VYM?
21.7% of their weight sits in the same 51 holdings. NOBL also reports WST, ESS, FRT, which the other does not. VYM also reports AVGO, JPM, CSCO, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between NOBL and VYM measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 100% of NOBL and 100% of VYM, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, VYM or NOBL?
NOBL reports 69 stock positions and VYM reports 601. 25.5% of NOBL's weight sits in names VYM does not hold, and 75.5% of VYM's weight in names NOBL does not hold. The ten largest positions are 16.5% of NOBL and 26.1% of VYM.
How do NOBL and VYM differ by sector?
The widest gap is Consumer Defensive: NOBL has 23.5 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.