ONEQ vs QQQ overlap - what they share and where they differ
ONEQ and QQQ share 66.7% of their weight across 97 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
ONEQ and QQQ
66.7%
97 shared positions
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
Reported positions cover 99% of the fund, 992 positions · May 31, 2026
Top 10: 59.6%·Holdings of ONEQ
QQQ
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 101 positions · Jun 30, 2026
Top 10: 47.8%·Holdings of QQQ
Reported positions cover ONEQ 99%, QQQ 100% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
QQQ vs ONEQ side by side
ONEQFidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
992
stock positions reported to the SEC
15.2% of its weight is in 895 names QQQ does not hold
QQQInvesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
101
stock positions reported to the SEC
2.6% of its weight is in 4 names ONEQ does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Technology: QQQ has 4.4 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| ONEQ | QQQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | May 31, 2026 | Jun 30, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 992 | 101 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 59.6% | 47.8% |
| Largest position | NVDA 11.2% | NVDA 7.6% |
| Held alone | 895 positions, 15.2% | 4 positions, 2.6% |
| Covered by stock positions | 99% | 100% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In ONEQ | In QQQ | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANVIDIA CORP | 11.18% | 7.60% | 7.60% |
| AAPLAPPLE INC | 9.98% | 6.67% | 6.67% |
| GOOGLALPHABET INC | 9.29% | 6.29% | 6.29% |
| MSFTMICROSOFT CORP | 7.29% | 4.35% | 4.35% |
| AMZNAMAZON.COM INC | 6.33% | 4.02% | 4.02% |
| TSLATESLA INC | 3.56% | 3.30% | 3.30% |
| AVGOBROADCOM INC | 4.61% | 2.81% | 2.81% |
| METAMETA PLATFORMS INC | 3.01% | 2.62% | 2.62% |
| MUMICRON TECHNOLOGY INC | 2.37% | 5.64% | 2.37% |
| WMTWALMART INC | 2.01% | 2.39% | 2.01% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in ONEQ
Only in QQQ
Questions people ask
Is ONEQ the same as QQQ?
66.7% of their weight sits in the same 97 holdings. ONEQ also reports SANDISK CORP/DE, EQIX, CME, which the other does not. QQQ also reports SNDK, ARM HOLDINGS PLC, HONA, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between ONEQ and QQQ measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 99% of ONEQ and 100% of QQQ, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, QQQ or ONEQ?
ONEQ reports 992 stock positions and QQQ reports 101. 15.2% of ONEQ's weight sits in names QQQ does not hold, and 2.6% of QQQ's weight in names ONEQ does not hold. The ten largest positions are 59.6% of ONEQ and 47.8% of QQQ.
How do ONEQ and QQQ differ by sector?
The widest gap is Technology: QQQ has 4.4 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Other pairs with these funds
QQQ against other funds in the table
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.