ONEQ vs VONG overlap - what they share and where they differ
ONEQ and VONG share 65.9% of their weight across 123 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
ONEQ and VONG
65.9%
123 shared positions
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 844 positions · May 31, 2026
Top 10: 59.6%·Holdings of ONEQ
VONG
VANGUARD RUSSELL 1000 GROWTH INDEX FUND
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 311 positions · May 31, 2026
Top 10: 62.8%·Holdings of VONG
Reported positions cover ONEQ 100%, VONG 100% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
VONG vs ONEQ side by side
ONEQFidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
844
stock positions reported to the SEC
24.3% of its weight is in 721 names VONG does not hold
VONGVANGUARD RUSSELL 1000 GROWTH INDEX FUND
311
stock positions reported to the SEC
23.8% of its weight is in 188 names ONEQ does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Financial Services: VONG has 2.2 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| ONEQ | VONG | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | May 31, 2026 | May 31, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 844 | 311 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 59.6% | 62.8% |
| Largest position | NVDA 11.2% | NVDA 13.1% |
| Held alone | 721 positions, 24.3% | 188 positions, 23.8% |
| Covered by stock positions | 100% | 100% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In ONEQ | In VONG | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANVIDIA CORP | 11.18% | 13.07% | 11.18% |
| AAPLAPPLE INC | 9.98% | 11.95% | 9.98% |
| MSFTMICROSOFT CORP | 7.29% | 8.96% | 7.29% |
| GOOGLALPHABET INC | 9.29% | 7.06% | 7.06% |
| AMZNAMAZON.COM INC | 6.33% | 5.06% | 5.06% |
| AVGOBROADCOM INC | 4.61% | 5.77% | 4.61% |
| TSLATESLA INC | 3.56% | 3.48% | 3.48% |
| METAMETA PLATFORMS INC | 3.01% | 3.19% | 3.01% |
| AMDADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC | 1.83% | 1.46% | 1.46% |
| COSTCOSTCO WHOLESALE CORP | 0.92% | 1.28% | 0.92% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in ONEQ
Only in VONG
Questions people ask
Is ONEQ the same as VONG?
65.9% of their weight sits in the same 123 holdings. ONEQ also reports MU, INTC, CSCO, which the other does not. VONG also reports LLY, V, MA, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between ONEQ and VONG measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 100% of ONEQ and 100% of VONG, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, VONG or ONEQ?
ONEQ reports 844 stock positions and VONG reports 311. 24.3% of ONEQ's weight sits in names VONG does not hold, and 23.8% of VONG's weight in names ONEQ does not hold. The ten largest positions are 59.6% of ONEQ and 62.8% of VONG.
How do ONEQ and VONG differ by sector?
The widest gap is Financial Services: VONG has 2.2 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.