PICK vs REMX overlap - what they share and where they differ
PICK and REMX share 2.5% of their weight across 17 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
PICK and REMX
2.5%
17 shared positions
PICK
iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF
Reported positions cover 99% of the fund, 235 positions · Aug 31, 2026
Top 10: 49.4%·Holdings of PICK
REMX
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF
Reported positions cover 97% of the fund, 30 positions · Jun 30, 2026
Top 10: 59.3%·Holdings of REMX
Reported positions cover PICK 99%, REMX 97% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
REMX vs PICK side by side
PICKiShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF
235
stock positions reported to the SEC
96.4% of its weight is in 218 names REMX does not hold
REMXVanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF
30
stock positions reported to the SEC
37.5% of its weight is in 13 names PICK does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Basic Materials: PICK has 11.3 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| PICK | REMX | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | Aug 31, 2026 | Jun 30, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 235 | 30 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 49.4% | 59.3% |
| Largest position | BHP 13.8% | XIAMEN TUNGSTEN CO., LTD. 7.0% |
| Held alone | 218 positions, 96.4% | 13 positions, 37.5% |
| Covered by stock positions | 99% | 97% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In PICK | In REMX | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| PLS GROUP LIMITED | 0.70% | 6.60% | 0.70% |
| LYNAS RARE EARTHS LIMITED | 0.59% | 6.56% | 0.59% |
| MPMP MATERIALS CORP | 0.45% | 5.99% | 0.45% |
| ILUKA RESOURCES LTDILUKA RESOURCES LIMITED | 0.12% | 3.28% | 0.12% |
| LIONTOWN LIMITED | 0.11% | 3.78% | 0.11% |
| AMG CRITICAL MATERIALS N.V. | 0.08% | 2.20% | 0.08% |
| CHINA NORTHERN RARE EARTH (GROUP) HIGH-TECH CO., LTD. | 0.08% | 6.82% | 0.08% |
| ELVRELEVRA LITHIUM LIMITED | 0.06% | 2.04% | 0.06% |
| LACLithium Americas Corp | 0.06% | 2.11% | 0.06% |
| SGMLSigma Lithium Corporation | 0.05% | 1.29% | 0.05% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in PICK
Only in REMX
Questions people ask
Is PICK the same as REMX?
2.5% of their weight sits in the same 17 holdings. PICK also reports BHP, RIO, FCX, which the other does not. REMX also reports ALB, SQM, ALM, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between PICK and REMX measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 99% of PICK and 97% of REMX, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, REMX or PICK?
PICK reports 235 stock positions and REMX reports 30. 96.4% of PICK's weight sits in names REMX does not hold, and 37.5% of REMX's weight in names PICK does not hold. The ten largest positions are 49.4% of PICK and 59.3% of REMX.
How do PICK and REMX differ by sector?
The widest gap is Basic Materials: PICK has 11.3 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.