PICK vs URA overlap - what they share and where they differ
PICK and URA share 2.7% of their weight across 2 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
PICK and URA
2.7%
2 shared positions
PICK
iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF
Reported positions cover 99% of the fund, 230 positions · May 31, 2026
Top 10: 48.9%·Holdings of PICK
URA
Global X Uranium ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 52 positions · Apr 30, 2026
Top 10: 66.1%·Holdings of URA
Reported positions cover PICK 99%, URA 100% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
URA vs PICK side by side
PICKiShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF
230
stock positions reported to the SEC
85.5% of its weight is in 228 names URA does not hold
URAGlobal X Uranium ETF
52
stock positions reported to the SEC
96.5% of its weight is in 50 names PICK does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Utilities: URA has 8.1 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| PICK | URA | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | May 31, 2026 | Apr 30, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 230 | 52 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 48.9% | 66.1% |
| Largest position | BHP 13.0% | CCJ 23.1% |
| Held alone | 228 positions, 85.5% | 50 positions, 96.5% |
| Covered by stock positions | 99% | 100% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In PICK | In URA | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| BHPBHP GROUP LIMITED | 13.03% | 2.21% | 2.21% |
| SIBANYE STILLWATER LIMITED | 0.49% | 1.30% | 0.49% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in PICK
Only in URA
Questions people ask
Is PICK the same as URA?
2.7% of their weight sits in the same 2 holdings. PICK also reports RIO, FCX, GLENCORE PLC, which the other does not. URA also reports CCJ, OKLO, NXE, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between PICK and URA measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 99% of PICK and 100% of URA, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, URA or PICK?
PICK reports 230 stock positions and URA reports 52. 85.5% of PICK's weight sits in names URA does not hold, and 96.5% of URA's weight in names PICK does not hold. The ten largest positions are 48.9% of PICK and 66.1% of URA.
How do PICK and URA differ by sector?
The widest gap is Utilities: URA has 8.1 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.