QTEC vs SOXQ overlap - what they share and where they differ
QTEC and SOXQ share 43.1% of their weight across 19 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
QTEC and SOXQ
43.1%
19 shared positions
QTEC
First Trust NASDAQ-100-Technology Sector Index Fund
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 46 positions · Jun 30, 2026
Top 10: 28.7%·Holdings of QTEC
SOXQ
Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF
Reported positions cover 99% of the fund, 30 positions · May 31, 2026
Top 10: 63.0%·Holdings of SOXQ
Reported positions cover QTEC 100%, SOXQ 99% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
SOXQ vs QTEC side by side
QTECFirst Trust NASDAQ-100-Technology Sector Index Fund
46
stock positions reported to the SEC
54.6% of its weight is in 27 names SOXQ does not hold
SOXQInvesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF
30
stock positions reported to the SEC
13.9% of its weight is in 11 names QTEC does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Technology: SOXQ has 3.0 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| QTEC | SOXQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | Jun 30, 2026 | May 31, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 46 | 30 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 28.7% | 63.0% |
| Largest position | AMAT 3.4% | MU 11.8% |
| Held alone | 27 positions, 54.6% | 11 positions, 13.9% |
| Covered by stock positions | 100% | 99% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In QTEC | In SOXQ | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| KLACKLA CORP | 3.29% | 3.14% | 3.14% |
| MRVLMARVELL TECHNOLOGY INC | 3.04% | 6.27% | 3.04% |
| AMATAPPLIED MATERIALS INC | 3.37% | 3.02% | 3.02% |
| LRCXLAM RESEARCH CORP | 2.85% | 3.40% | 2.85% |
| ASMLASML HOLDING NV | 2.59% | 2.78% | 2.59% |
| INTCINTEL CORP | 2.55% | 6.28% | 2.55% |
| MUMICRON TECHNOLOGY INC | 2.49% | 11.76% | 2.49% |
| AMDADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC | 2.36% | 6.44% | 2.36% |
| TERTERADYNE INC | 2.71% | 2.15% | 2.15% |
| ALABASTERA LABS INC | 2.95% | 2.14% | 2.14% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in QTEC
Only in SOXQ
Questions people ask
Is QTEC the same as SOXQ?
43.1% of their weight sits in the same 19 holdings. QTEC also reports SNDK, PANW, WDC, which the other does not. SOXQ also reports TSM, COHR, ON, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between QTEC and SOXQ measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 100% of QTEC and 99% of SOXQ, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, SOXQ or QTEC?
QTEC reports 46 stock positions and SOXQ reports 30. 54.6% of QTEC's weight sits in names SOXQ does not hold, and 13.9% of SOXQ's weight in names QTEC does not hold. The ten largest positions are 28.7% of QTEC and 63.0% of SOXQ.
How do QTEC and SOXQ differ by sector?
The widest gap is Technology: SOXQ has 3.0 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.