QTUM vs RSPT overlap - what they share and where they differ
QTUM and RSPT share 27.5% of their weight across 25 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
QTUM and RSPT
27.5%
25 shared positions
QTUM
Defiance Quantum ETF
Reported positions cover 99% of the fund, 86 positions · Jun 30, 2026
Top 10: 16.9%·Holdings of QTUM
RSPT
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 74 positions · Jul 31, 2026
Top 10: 16.4%·Holdings of RSPT
Reported positions cover QTUM 99%, RSPT 100% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
RSPT vs QTUM side by side
QTUMDefiance Quantum ETF
86
stock positions reported to the SEC
70.4% of its weight is in 61 names RSPT does not hold
RSPTInvesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF
74
stock positions reported to the SEC
68.9% of its weight is in 49 names QTUM does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Technology: RSPT has 28.3 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| QTUM | RSPT | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | Jun 30, 2026 | Jul 31, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 86 | 74 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 16.9% | 16.4% |
| Largest position | ARQQ 2.4% | ZBRA 1.9% |
| Held alone | 61 positions, 70.4% | 49 positions, 68.9% |
| Covered by stock positions | 99% | 100% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In QTUM | In RSPT | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| TERTeradyne Inc | 1.48% | 1.44% | 1.44% |
| AMATApplied Materials Inc | 1.55% | 1.40% | 1.40% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 1.36% | 1.44% | 1.36% |
| MUMicron Technology Inc | 1.38% | 1.26% | 1.26% |
| LRCXLam Research Corp | 1.43% | 1.24% | 1.24% |
| KLACKLA Corp | 1.50% | 1.17% | 1.17% |
| INTCIntel Corp | 1.39% | 1.15% | 1.15% |
| TXNTexas Instruments Inc | 1.12% | 1.33% | 1.12% |
| IBM | 1.10% | 1.12% | 1.10% |
| MCHPMicrochip Technology Inc | 1.10% | 1.15% | 1.10% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in QTUM
Only in RSPT
Questions people ask
Is QTUM the same as RSPT?
27.5% of their weight sits in the same 25 holdings. QTUM also reports ARQQ, HQ, QNT, which the other does not. RSPT also reports ZBRA, PANW, ANET, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between QTUM and RSPT measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 99% of QTUM and 100% of RSPT, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, RSPT or QTUM?
QTUM reports 86 stock positions and RSPT reports 74. 70.4% of QTUM's weight sits in names RSPT does not hold, and 68.9% of RSPT's weight in names QTUM does not hold. The ten largest positions are 16.9% of QTUM and 16.4% of RSPT.
How do QTUM and RSPT differ by sector?
The widest gap is Technology: RSPT has 28.3 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.