REMX vs SPHB overlap - what they share and where they differ
REMX and SPHB share 0.8% of their weight across 1 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
REMX and SPHB
0.8%
1 shared positions
REMX
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF
Reported positions cover 97% of the fund, 30 positions · Jun 30, 2026
Top 10: 59.3%·Holdings of REMX
SPHB
Invesco S&P 500 High Beta ETF
Reported positions cover 102% of the fund, 100 positions · May 31, 2026
Top 10: 17.4%·Holdings of SPHB
Reported positions cover REMX 97%, SPHB 102% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
SPHB vs REMX side by side
REMXVanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF
30
stock positions reported to the SEC
89.5% of its weight is in 29 names SPHB does not hold
SPHBInvesco S&P 500 High Beta ETF
100
stock positions reported to the SEC
101.3% of its weight is in 99 names REMX does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Technology: SPHB has 52.4 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| REMX | SPHB | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | Jun 30, 2026 | May 31, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 30 | 100 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 59.3% | 17.4% |
| Largest position | XIAMEN TUNGSTEN CO LTD 7.0% | SNDK 2.2% |
| Held alone | 29 positions, 89.5% | 99 positions, 101.3% |
| Covered by stock positions | 97% | 102% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In REMX | In SPHB | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALBAlbemarle Corp | 6.99% | 0.76% | 0.76% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in REMX
Only in SPHB
Questions people ask
Is REMX the same as SPHB?
0.8% of their weight sits in the same 1 holdings. REMX also reports XIAMEN TUNGSTEN CO LTD, CHINA NORTHERN RARE EARTH GROUP HIGH-TECH CO LTD, PLS GROUP LTD, which the other does not. SPHB also reports SNDK, SMCI, HOOD, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between REMX and SPHB measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 97% of REMX and 102% of SPHB, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, SPHB or REMX?
REMX reports 30 stock positions and SPHB reports 100. 89.5% of REMX's weight sits in names SPHB does not hold, and 101.3% of SPHB's weight in names REMX does not hold. The ten largest positions are 59.3% of REMX and 17.4% of SPHB.
How do REMX and SPHB differ by sector?
The widest gap is Technology: SPHB has 52.4 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.