SCHA vs VTWO overlap - what they share and where they differ
SCHA and VTWO share 63.2% of their weight across 1,252 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
SCHA and VTWO
63.2%
1,252 shared positions
SCHA
Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 1,552 positions · May 31, 2026
Top 10: 10.5%·Holdings of SCHA
VTWO
VANGUARD RUSSELL 2000 INDEX FUND
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 1,641 positions · May 31, 2026
Top 10: 7.8%·Holdings of VTWO
Reported positions cover SCHA 100%, VTWO 100% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
VTWO vs SCHA side by side
SCHASchwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF
1,552
stock positions reported to the SEC
36.3% of its weight is in 300 names VTWO does not hold
VTWOVANGUARD RUSSELL 2000 INDEX FUND
1,641
stock positions reported to the SEC
12.6% of its weight is in 389 names SCHA does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Technology: VTWO has 3.3 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| SCHA | VTWO | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | May 31, 2026 | May 31, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 1,552 | 1,641 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 10.5% | 7.8% |
| Largest position | SANDISK CORP/DE 5.3% | BE 1.8% |
| Held alone | 300 positions, 36.3% | 389 positions, 12.6% |
| Covered by stock positions | 100% | 100% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In SCHA | In VTWO | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| STRLSterling Infrastructure Inc | 0.56% | 0.75% | 0.56% |
| NXTNextpower Inc | 0.49% | 0.67% | 0.49% |
| CDECoeur Mining Inc | 0.42% | 0.58% | 0.42% |
| TTMITTM Technologies Inc | 0.38% | 0.52% | 0.38% |
| ECHOEchoStar Corp | 0.37% | 0.51% | 0.37% |
| GHGuardant Health Inc | 0.35% | 0.47% | 0.35% |
| RMBSRambus Inc | 0.33% | 0.46% | 0.33% |
| SITMSiTime Corp | 0.33% | 0.47% | 0.33% |
| DYDycom Industries Inc | 0.32% | 0.44% | 0.32% |
| MODModine Manufacturing Co | 0.31% | 0.43% | 0.31% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in SCHA
Only in VTWO
Questions people ask
Is SCHA the same as VTWO?
63.2% of their weight sits in the same 1,252 holdings. SCHA also reports SANDISK CORP/DE, LITE, RVMD, which the other does not. VTWO also reports BE, CRDO, FN, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between SCHA and VTWO measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 100% of SCHA and 100% of VTWO, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, VTWO or SCHA?
SCHA reports 1,552 stock positions and VTWO reports 1,641. 36.3% of SCHA's weight sits in names VTWO does not hold, and 12.6% of VTWO's weight in names SCHA does not hold. The ten largest positions are 10.5% of SCHA and 7.8% of VTWO.
How do SCHA and VTWO differ by sector?
The widest gap is Technology: VTWO has 3.3 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.