SCHF vs VPL overlap - what they share and where they differ
SCHF and VPL share 38.6% of their weight across 662 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
SCHF and VPL
38.6%
662 shared positions
SCHF
Schwab International Equity ETF
Reported positions cover 99% of the fund, 1,257 positions · May 31, 2026
Top 10: 15.1%·Holdings of SCHF
VPL
VANGUARD PACIFIC STOCK INDEX FUND
Reported positions cover 97% of the fund, 1,355 positions · Apr 30, 2026
Top 10: 23.7%·Holdings of VPL
Reported positions cover SCHF 99%, VPL 97% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
VPL vs SCHF side by side
SCHFSchwab International Equity ETF
1,257
stock positions reported to the SEC
59.1% of its weight is in 595 names VPL does not hold
VPLVANGUARD PACIFIC STOCK INDEX FUND
1,355
stock positions reported to the SEC
9.5% of its weight is in 693 names SCHF does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Healthcare: SCHF has 3.4 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| SCHF | VPL | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | May 31, 2026 | Apr 30, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 1,257 | 1,355 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 15.1% | 23.7% |
| Largest position | SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD 3.3% | SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD 6.0% |
| Held alone | 595 positions, 59.1% | 693 positions, 9.5% |
| Covered by stock positions | 99% | 97% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In SCHF | In VPL | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD | 3.32% | 6.00% | 3.32% |
| SKHYSK hynix Inc | 2.81% | 4.08% | 2.81% |
| MUFGMitsubishi Corp | 1.04% | 2.56% | 1.04% |
| BHPBHP Group Ltd | 0.74% | 1.64% | 0.74% |
| NODKNippon Kayaku Co Ltd | 0.70% | 2.06% | 0.70% |
| TMToyota Motor Corp | 0.68% | 1.73% | 0.68% |
| SMFGSumitomo Mitsui Trust Holdings Inc | 0.67% | 1.59% | 0.67% |
| COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA | 0.66% | 1.78% | 0.66% |
| SOFTBANK GROUP CORP | 0.62% | 1.13% | 0.62% |
| TOKYO ELECTRON LTD | 0.49% | 1.10% | 0.49% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in SCHF
Only in VPL
Questions people ask
Is SCHF the same as VPL?
38.6% of their weight sits in the same 662 holdings. SCHF also reports ASML, HSBC, ROCHE HOLDING AG, which the other does not. VPL also reports ANZ GROUP HOLDINGS LTD, DOOSAN ENERBILITY CO LTD, MITSUI KINZOKU CO LTD, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between SCHF and VPL measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 99% of SCHF and 97% of VPL, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, VPL or SCHF?
SCHF reports 1,257 stock positions and VPL reports 1,355. 59.1% of SCHF's weight sits in names VPL does not hold, and 9.5% of VPL's weight in names SCHF does not hold. The ten largest positions are 15.1% of SCHF and 23.7% of VPL.
How do SCHF and VPL differ by sector?
The widest gap is Healthcare: SCHF has 3.4 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Other pairs with these funds
SCHF against other funds in the table
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.