SCHV vs SPLV overlap - what they share and where they differ
SCHV and SPLV share 24.3% of their weight across 94 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
SCHV and SPLV
24.3%
94 shared positions
SCHV
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 555 positions · May 31, 2026
Top 10: 20.3%·Holdings of SCHV
SPLV
Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 100 positions · May 31, 2026
Top 10: 12.5%·Holdings of SPLV
Reported positions cover SCHV 100%, SPLV 100% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
SPLV vs SCHV side by side
SCHVSchwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF
555
stock positions reported to the SEC
70.3% of its weight is in 461 names SPLV does not hold
SPLVInvesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF
100
stock positions reported to the SEC
5.6% of its weight is in 6 names SCHV does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Utilities: SPLV has 28.0 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| SCHV | SPLV | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | May 31, 2026 | May 31, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 555 | 100 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 20.3% | 12.5% |
| Largest position | MU 3.5% | FE 1.3% |
| Held alone | 461 positions, 70.3% | 6 positions, 5.6% |
| Covered by stock positions | 100% | 100% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In SCHV | In SPLV | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| BRK.ABerkshire Hathaway Inc | 2.82% | 1.28% | 1.28% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson | 1.76% | 1.15% | 1.15% |
| PGProcter & Gamble Co/The | 1.08% | 1.07% | 1.07% |
| KOCoca-Cola Co/The | 0.99% | 1.18% | 0.99% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 1.11% | 0.88% | 0.88% |
| BACBank of America Corp | 1.11% | 0.87% | 0.87% |
| JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co | 2.62% | 0.87% | 0.87% |
| WMTWalmart Inc | 1.65% | 0.78% | 0.78% |
| MCDMcDonald's Corp | 0.64% | 1.16% | 0.64% |
| PEPPepsiCo Inc | 0.64% | 0.84% | 0.64% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in SCHV
Only in SPLV
Questions people ask
Is SCHV the same as SPLV?
24.3% of their weight sits in the same 94 holdings. SCHV also reports MU, XOM, INTC, which the other does not. SPLV also reports LIN, COST, V, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between SCHV and SPLV measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 100% of SCHV and 100% of SPLV, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, SPLV or SCHV?
SCHV reports 555 stock positions and SPLV reports 100. 70.3% of SCHV's weight sits in names SPLV does not hold, and 5.6% of SPLV's weight in names SCHV does not hold. The ten largest positions are 20.3% of SCHV and 12.5% of SPLV.
How do SCHV and SPLV differ by sector?
The widest gap is Utilities: SPLV has 28.0 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.