SCHV vs XLF overlap - what they share and where they differ
SCHV and XLF share 17.9% of their weight across 61 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
SCHV and XLF
17.9%
61 shared positions
SCHV
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 552 positions · May 31, 2026
Top 10: 20.3%·Holdings of SCHV
XLF
State Street(R) Financial Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 76 positions · Jun 30, 2026
Top 10: 57.6%·Holdings of XLF
Reported positions cover SCHV 100%, XLF 100% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
XLF vs SCHV side by side
SCHVSchwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF
552
stock positions reported to the SEC
82.0% of its weight is in 491 names XLF does not hold
XLFState Street(R) Financial Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
76
stock positions reported to the SEC
24.2% of its weight is in 15 names SCHV does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Financial Services: XLF has 67.7 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| SCHV | XLF | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | May 31, 2026 | Jun 30, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 552 | 76 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 20.3% | 57.6% |
| Largest position | MU 3.5% | BRK.A 12.1% |
| Held alone | 491 positions, 82.0% | 15 positions, 24.2% |
| Covered by stock positions | 100% | 100% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In SCHV | In XLF | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| BRK.ABerkshire Hathaway Inc | 2.82% | 12.08% | 2.82% |
| JPMORGAN CHASE & CO | 2.62% | 11.55% | 2.62% |
| BACBank of America Corp | 1.11% | 4.90% | 1.11% |
| GSGoldman Sachs Group Inc/The | 1.00% | 3.93% | 1.00% |
| MSMorgan Stanley | 0.81% | 3.30% | 0.81% |
| WFCWells Fargo & Co | 0.78% | 3.33% | 0.78% |
| CCitigroup Inc | 0.71% | 3.14% | 0.71% |
| AXPAmerican Express Co | 0.55% | 2.37% | 0.55% |
| SCHWCharles Schwab Corp/The | 0.47% | 1.99% | 0.47% |
| COFCapital One Financial Corp | 0.38% | 1.64% | 0.38% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in SCHV
Only in XLF
Questions people ask
Is SCHV the same as XLF?
17.9% of their weight sits in the same 61 holdings. SCHV also reports MU, EXXON MOBIL CORP, JNJ, which the other does not. XLF also reports V, MA, BLK, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between SCHV and XLF measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 100% of SCHV and 100% of XLF, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, XLF or SCHV?
SCHV reports 552 stock positions and XLF reports 76. 82.0% of SCHV's weight sits in names XLF does not hold, and 24.2% of XLF's weight in names SCHV does not hold. The ten largest positions are 20.3% of SCHV and 57.6% of XLF.
How do SCHV and XLF differ by sector?
The widest gap is Financial Services: XLF has 67.7 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.