URA vs VPL overlap - what they share and where they differ
URA and VPL share 3.5% of their weight across 14 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
URA and VPL
3.5%
14 shared positions
URA
Global X Uranium ETF
Reported positions cover 99% of the fund, 57 positions · Jul 31, 2026
Top 10: 63.0%·Holdings of URA
VPL
VANGUARD PACIFIC STOCK INDEX FUND
Reported positions cover 99% of the fund, 2,168 positions · Jul 31, 2026
Top 10: 25.7%·Holdings of VPL
Reported positions cover URA 99%, VPL 99% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
VPL vs URA side by side
URAGlobal X Uranium ETF
57
stock positions reported to the SEC
76.8% of its weight is in 43 names VPL does not hold
VPLVANGUARD PACIFIC STOCK INDEX FUND
2,168
stock positions reported to the SEC
95.0% of its weight is in 2,154 names URA does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Basic Materials: URA has 52.1 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| URA | VPL | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | Jul 31, 2026 | Jul 31, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 57 | 2,168 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 63.0% | 25.7% |
| Largest position | CCJ 22.2% | SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. 6.6% |
| Held alone | 43 positions, 76.8% | 2,154 positions, 95.0% |
| Covered by stock positions | 99% | 99% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In URA | In VPL | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| BHPBHP GROUP LIMITED | 2.06% | 1.77% | 1.77% |
| ITOCHU CORPORATION | 2.11% | 0.65% | 0.65% |
| MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES LTDMitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. | 2.04% | 0.63% | 0.63% |
| DOOSAN ENERBILITY CO., LTD. | 1.96% | 0.17% | 0.17% |
| SAMSUNG C&T CORPSAMSUNG C&T CORPORATION | 2.06% | 0.15% | 0.15% |
| HYUNDAI ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CO.,LTD | 1.94% | 0.04% | 0.04% |
| PALADIN ENERGY LTD | 3.14% | 0.02% | 0.02% |
| CGN MINING CO LTD | 1.09% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
| DAEWOO ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CO LTDDAEWOO ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CO., LTD. | 1.71% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
| DEEP YELLOW LTD | 0.90% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in URA
Only in VPL
Questions people ask
Is URA the same as VPL?
3.5% of their weight sits in the same 14 holdings. URA also reports CCJ, SII, OKLO, which the other does not. VPL also reports SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SKHY, MUFG, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between URA and VPL measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 99% of URA and 99% of VPL, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, VPL or URA?
URA reports 57 stock positions and VPL reports 2,168. 76.8% of URA's weight sits in names VPL does not hold, and 95.0% of VPL's weight in names URA does not hold. The ten largest positions are 63.0% of URA and 25.7% of VPL.
How do URA and VPL differ by sector?
The widest gap is Basic Materials: URA has 52.1 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.