VIG vs XLF overlap - what they share and where they differ
VIG and XLF share 20.6% of their weight across 38 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
VIG and XLF
20.6%
38 shared positions
VIG
VANGUARD DIVIDEND APPRECIATION INDEX FUND
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 330 positions · Jul 31, 2026
Top 10: 33.4%·Holdings of VIG
XLF
State Street(R) Financial Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 76 positions · Jun 30, 2026
Top 10: 57.6%·Holdings of XLF
Reported positions cover VIG 100%, XLF 100% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
XLF vs VIG side by side
VIGVANGUARD DIVIDEND APPRECIATION INDEX FUND
330
stock positions reported to the SEC
79.1% of its weight is in 292 names XLF does not hold
XLFState Street(R) Financial Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
76
stock positions reported to the SEC
41.0% of its weight is in 38 names VIG does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Financial Services: XLF has 75.8 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| VIG | XLF | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | Jul 31, 2026 | Jun 30, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 330 | 76 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 33.4% | 57.6% |
| Largest position | AVGO 4.6% | BRK.A 12.1% |
| Held alone | 292 positions, 79.1% | 38 positions, 41.0% |
| Covered by stock positions | 100% | 100% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In VIG | In XLF | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co | 4.07% | 11.55% | 4.07% |
| VVisa Inc | 2.45% | 7.50% | 2.45% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 2.00% | 5.46% | 2.00% |
| BACBank of America Corp | 1.75% | 4.90% | 1.75% |
| GSGoldman Sachs Group Inc/The | 1.24% | 3.93% | 1.24% |
| MSMorgan Stanley | 1.09% | 3.30% | 1.09% |
| BLKBlackRock Funding Inc/DE | 0.68% | 1.83% | 0.68% |
| CBChubb Ltd | 0.55% | 1.62% | 0.55% |
| SPGIS&P Global Inc | 0.54% | 1.63% | 0.54% |
| BNYBank of New York Mellon Corp/The | 0.46% | 1.31% | 0.46% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in VIG
Only in XLF
Questions people ask
Is VIG the same as XLF?
20.6% of their weight sits in the same 38 holdings. VIG also reports AVGO, AAPL, MSFT, which the other does not. XLF also reports BRK.A, WFC, C, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between VIG and XLF measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 100% of VIG and 100% of XLF, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, XLF or VIG?
VIG reports 330 stock positions and XLF reports 76. 79.1% of VIG's weight sits in names XLF does not hold, and 41.0% of XLF's weight in names VIG does not hold. The ten largest positions are 33.4% of VIG and 57.6% of XLF.
How do VIG and XLF differ by sector?
The widest gap is Financial Services: XLF has 75.8 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.