$51.02
Value $366B
Bank of AmericavsPeapack-Gladstone Financial
BAC and PGC stock compared: price, dividend, valuation and results, from SEC filings.
+1.01%
$46.12
Value $810M
Bank of America (BAC) has a market value of $366B and Peapack-Gladstone Financial (PGC) $810M. Over the last year, with dividends, BAC moved -3.7% and PGC +78.3%. The P/E is 11.9 for BAC and 13.4 for PGC. Dividend yield: BAC 2.27%, PGC 0.44%.
At a glance
The main figures of both. A bar only shows which number is larger, not which is better.
Market value
BAC$366B
PGC$810M
BAC is 452 times PGC
Revenue, 12 months
BAC$120B
PGC$334M
BAC is 359 times PGC
Net income, 12 months
BAC$32.2B
PGC$61M
BAC is 527 times PGC
Operating margin
BAC–
PGC–
ROIC
BAC5.2%
PGC7.5%
2.3 points apart
P/E
BAC11.9
PGC13.4
PGC is 1.1 times BAC
Dividend yield
BAC2.3%
PGC0.4%
1.9 points apart
5-year return
BAC+22.9%
PGC+36.4%
13.5 points apart
A fainter bar means a negative number. The 5-year return includes dividends.
The price over time
Both start at 100 at the beginning of the period, so the lines show how much each changed. With dividends means each dividend buys more shares.
BAC+22.9%
PGC+36.4%
| Period | BACWith dividends | PGCWith dividends |
|---|---|---|
| 1 year since November 12, 2025 | -3.7%Price -5.7% | +78.3%Price +77.5% |
| 3 years since November 13, 2023 | +97.9%+25.6% a yearPrice +84.2% | +90.2%+23.9% a yearPrice +86.5% |
| 5 years since November 12, 2021 | +22.9%+4.2% a yearPrice +8.8% | +36.4%+6.4% a yearPrice +32.1% |
| 10 years since November 15, 2016 | +216.3%+12.2% a yearPrice +153.1% | +90.0%+6.6% a yearPrice +77.5% |
Each cell: the total return with dividends, its yearly rate, and the price change alone. Before taxes and costs. Past returns do not predict future ones.
Every figure
As on each company's page. A description, not a recommendation: no one figure says which is better.
BACBank of AmericaPGCPeapack-Gladstone Financial
Valuation
BACPGC| Price | $51.02 | $46.12 |
|---|---|---|
| Market value | $366B | $810M |
| Enterprise value (EV) | – | – |
| P/E | 11.9 | 13.4 |
| P/E, 5-year median | 12.5 | 12.1 |
| P/B | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| EV/EBIT | – | – |
| Free cash flow yield | – | – |
Results and growth
BACPGC| Revenue, 12 months | $120B | $334M |
|---|---|---|
| Net income, 12 months | $32.2B | $61M |
| Free cash flow, 12 months | – | – |
| Earnings per share, 12 months | $4.20 | $3.34 |
| Revenue growth, year on year | 6.8% | 24.1% |
| Revenue growth a year, past | +5.8%over 5 years | +8.4%over 5 years |
| EPS growth a year, past | +15.3%over 5 years | +8.9%over 5 years |
Margins and returns on capital
BACPGC| Gross margin | – | – |
|---|---|---|
| Operating margin | – | – |
| Net margin | 26.8% | 18.3% |
| ROIC | 5.2% | 7.5% |
| ROE | 10.7% | 8.9% |
Balance sheet
BACPGC| Cash | $802B | $448M |
|---|---|---|
| Total debt | $319B | $281M |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | – |
| Interest cover | – | – |
Dividends and buybacks
BACPGC| Dividend yield | 2.3% | 0.4% |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend per share, 12 months | $1.16 | $0.20 |
| Dividend growth a year, past | +8.5%over 5 years | -0.0%over 5 years |
| Buyback yield | 5.9% | 0.7% |
| Shareholder yield | 8.1% | 1.1% |
Last 12 months from the latest 10-Q and 10-K. Value, P/E and yields at today's price. A dash means the figure does not exist or did not pass our checks.
Which is bigger, Bank of America or Peapack-Gladstone Financial?
By market value, Bank of America ($366B) is about 451.8 times Peapack-Gladstone Financial ($810M), at today's prices.
How did BAC and PGC stock do over the last 10 years?
Since November 15, 2016, BAC's price moved +153.1% and PGC's +77.5%. With dividends: BAC +216.3% (+12.2% a year), PGC +90.0% (+6.6% a year). Past returns do not predict future ones.
Which pays the higher dividend, BAC or PGC?
The dividend yield at today's price is 2.27% for Bank of America and 0.44% for Peapack-Gladstone Financial. Over the last twelve months they paid $1.16 and $0.20 per share.
What is the P/E of BAC and PGC?
At today's price, the P/E is 11.9 for BAC and 13.4 for PGC. The median of the last five years was 12.5 and 12.1, which shows where each stands against its own past.
Which has the higher profit margins, Bank of America or Peapack-Gladstone Financial?
Over the last twelve months, the net margin was 26.8% for Bank of America and 18.3% for Peapack-Gladstone Financial, and the operating margin – and –. Revenue was $120B and $334M.
Which is the better investment, Bank of America or Peapack-Gladstone Financial?
The page does not answer that and does not suggest buying or selling. It puts the two companies' numbers side by side, from their SEC filings, for you to read and form your own view. The decision depends on your goals and situation.
Other comparisons
With each of the two, and with the largest in its sector.
Related pages
The other pages on US stocks, free to read. On the company pages, the last three fiscal years are open to everyone, five with a free account, and every year with Ploutos Investor.
US stocksThe market today, the sectors, the largest companies and the week's results.The market's sectorsThe 11 sectors side by side: returns, share of the market, median P/E and dividend.Compare stocksTwo companies side by side: price over up to ten years, with and without dividends, and every figure.US dividend stocksEach dividend's yield next to whether the company's cash covers it and whether it was ever cut.
Descriptive data from SEC filings and market prices.