$32.42
Value $8.3B
CelsiusvsProcter & Gamble
CELH and PG stock compared: price, dividend, valuation and results, from SEC filings.
+1.66%
$169.80
Value $395B
Celsius (CELH) has a market value of $8.3B and Procter & Gamble (PG) $395B. Over the last year, with dividends, CELH moved -27.8% and PG +18.0%. The P/E is 35.4 for CELH and 25.1 for PG. Dividend yield: CELH none, PG 2.55%.
At a glance
The main figures of both. A bar only shows which number is larger, not which is better.
Market value
CELH$8.3B
PG$395B
PG is 47 times CELH
Revenue, 12 months
CELH$3.2B
PG$87.9B
PG is 28 times CELH
Net income, 12 months
CELH$317M
PG$16.0B
PG is 51 times CELH
Operating margin
CELH13.0%
PG22.6%
9.6 points apart
ROIC
CELH17.2%
PG17.3%
0.1 points apart
P/E
CELH35.4
PG25.1
CELH is 1.4 times PG
Dividend yield
CELH0.0%
PG2.6%
2.6 points apart
5-year return
CELH+16.7%
PG+31.8%
15.1 points apart
A fainter bar means a negative number. The 5-year return includes dividends.
The price over time
Both start at 100 at the beginning of the period, so the lines show how much each changed. With dividends means each dividend buys more shares.
CELH+16.7%
PG+31.8%
| Period | CELHWith dividends | PGWith dividends |
|---|---|---|
| 1 year since November 12, 2025 | -27.8%Price -27.8% | +18.0%Price +14.7% |
| 3 years since November 13, 2023 | -40.1%-15.7% a yearPrice -40.1% | +20.5%+6.4% a yearPrice +11.4% |
| 5 years since November 12, 2021 | +16.7%+3.1% a yearPrice +16.7% | +31.8%+5.7% a yearPrice +15.9% |
| 10 years since November 15, 2016 | +4,128.5%+45.4% a yearPrice +4,128.5% | +166.5%+10.3% a yearPrice +103.1% |
Each cell: the total return with dividends, its yearly rate, and the price change alone. Before taxes and costs. Past returns do not predict future ones.
Every figure
As on each company's page. A description, not a recommendation: no one figure says which is better.
CELHCelsiusPGProcter & Gamble
Valuation
CELHPG| Price | $32.42 | $169.80 |
|---|---|---|
| Market value | $8.3B | $395B |
| Enterprise value (EV) | $8.3B | $418B |
| P/E | 35.4 | 25.1 |
| P/E, 5-year median | – | 24.8 |
| P/B | 6.5 | 7.2 |
| EV/EBIT | 20.1 | 21.1 |
| Free cash flow yield | 3.2% | 3.9% |
Results and growth
CELHPG| Revenue, 12 months | $3.2B | $87.9B |
|---|---|---|
| Net income, 12 months | $317M | $16.0B |
| Free cash flow, 12 months | $269M | $15.3B |
| Earnings per share, 12 months | $0.89 | $6.64 |
| Revenue growth, year on year | 85.5% | 3.3% |
| Revenue growth a year, past | +80.7%over 5 years | +2.7%over 5 years |
| EPS growth a year, past | +46.8%over 5 years | +3.8%over 5 years |
Margins and returns on capital
CELHPG| Gross margin | 47.6% | 49.8% |
|---|---|---|
| Operating margin | 13.0% | 22.6% |
| Net margin | 10.0% | 18.2% |
| ROIC | 17.2% | 17.3% |
| ROE | 26.0% | 29.5% |
Balance sheet
CELHPG| Cash | $701M | $15.4B |
|---|---|---|
| Total debt | $675M | $38.9B |
| Net debt / EBITDA | -0.1 | 1.0 |
| Interest cover | 8.7× | 22.0× |
Dividends and buybacks
CELHPG| Dividend yield | – | 2.6% |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend per share, 12 months | – | $4.32 |
| Dividend growth a year, past | – | +5.6%over 5 years |
| Buyback yield | 0.1% | 1.3% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.1% | 3.8% |
Last 12 months from the latest 10-Q and 10-K. Value, P/E and yields at today's price. A dash means the figure does not exist or did not pass our checks.
Which is bigger, Celsius or Procter & Gamble?
By market value, Procter & Gamble ($395B) is about 47.4 times Celsius ($8.3B), at today's prices.
How did CELH and PG stock do over the last 10 years?
Since November 15, 2016, CELH's price moved +4,128.5% and PG's +103.1%. With dividends: CELH +4,128.5% (+45.4% a year), PG +166.5% (+10.3% a year). Past returns do not predict future ones.
Which pays the higher dividend, CELH or PG?
The dividend yield at today's price is none for Celsius and 2.55% for Procter & Gamble. Over the last twelve months they paid – and $4.32 per share.
What is the P/E of CELH and PG?
At today's price, the P/E is 35.4 for CELH and 25.1 for PG. It is the share price over the last twelve months' earnings per share.
Which has the higher profit margins, Celsius or Procter & Gamble?
Over the last twelve months, the net margin was 10.0% for Celsius and 18.2% for Procter & Gamble, and the operating margin 13.0% and 22.6%. Revenue was $3.2B and $87.9B.
Which is the better investment, Celsius or Procter & Gamble?
The page does not answer that and does not suggest buying or selling. It puts the two companies' numbers side by side, from their SEC filings, for you to read and form your own view. The decision depends on your goals and situation.
Other comparisons
With each of the two, and with the largest in its sector.
Related pages
The other pages on US stocks, free to read. On the company pages, the last three fiscal years are open to everyone, five with a free account, and every year with Ploutos Investor.
US stocksThe market today, the sectors, the largest companies and the week's results.The market's sectorsThe 11 sectors side by side: returns, share of the market, median P/E and dividend.Compare stocksTwo companies side by side: price over up to ten years, with and without dividends, and every figure.US dividend stocksEach dividend's yield next to whether the company's cash covers it and whether it was ever cut.
Descriptive data from SEC filings and market prices.