CGGR vs IWF overlap - what they share and where they differ
CGGR and IWF share 46.5% of their weight across 47 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
CGGR and IWF
46.5%
47 shared positions
CGGR
Capital Group Growth ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 88 positions · May 31, 2026
Top 10: 46.2%·Holdings of CGGR
IWF
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 365 positions · Jun 30, 2026
Top 10: 57.1%·Holdings of IWF
Reported positions cover CGGR 100%, IWF 100% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
IWF vs CGGR side by side
CGGRCapital Group Growth ETF
88
stock positions reported to the SEC
26.9% of its weight is in 41 names IWF does not hold
IWFiShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
365
stock positions reported to the SEC
31.8% of its weight is in 318 names CGGR does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Technology: IWF has 16.3 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| CGGR | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | May 31, 2026 | Jun 30, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 88 | 365 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 46.2% | 57.1% |
| Largest position | META 7.1% | NVDA 13.8% |
| Held alone | 41 positions, 26.9% | 318 positions, 31.8% |
| Covered by stock positions | 100% | 100% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In CGGR | In IWF | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 6.42% | 11.15% | 6.42% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 5.40% | 5.21% | 5.21% |
| NVDANVIDIA Corp | 5.16% | 13.83% | 5.16% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 4.37% | 4.11% | 4.11% |
| MUMicron Technology Inc | 4.86% | 3.86% | 3.86% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 5.85% | 3.64% | 3.64% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 7.09% | 3.00% | 3.00% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co | 1.81% | 2.84% | 1.81% |
| AAPLApple Inc | 1.79% | 6.72% | 1.79% |
| VVisa Inc | 2.34% | 1.68% | 1.68% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in CGGR
Only in IWF
Questions people ask
Is CGGR the same as IWF?
46.5% of their weight sits in the same 47 holdings. CGGR also reports CAPITAL GROUP CENTRAL CASH FUND, SHOP, SKHY, which the other does not. IWF also reports AMD, AMAT, LRCX, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between CGGR and IWF measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 100% of CGGR and 100% of IWF, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, IWF or CGGR?
CGGR reports 88 stock positions and IWF reports 365. 26.9% of CGGR's weight sits in names IWF does not hold, and 31.8% of IWF's weight in names CGGR does not hold. The ten largest positions are 46.2% of CGGR and 57.1% of IWF.
How do CGGR and IWF differ by sector?
The widest gap is Technology: IWF has 16.3 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Other pairs with these funds
IWF against other funds in the table
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.