COWZ vs USMV overlap - what they share and where they differ
COWZ and USMV share 17.9% of their weight across 34 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
COWZ and USMV
17.9%
34 shared positions
COWZ
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 100 positions · Apr 30, 2026
Top 10: 21.1%·Holdings of COWZ
USMV
iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 170 positions · Apr 30, 2026
Top 10: 15.6%·Holdings of USMV
Reported positions cover COWZ 100%, USMV 100% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
USMV vs COWZ side by side
COWZPacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
100
stock positions reported to the SEC
61.2% of its weight is in 66 names USMV does not hold
USMViShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF
170
stock positions reported to the SEC
80.1% of its weight is in 136 names COWZ does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Energy: COWZ has 15.2 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| COWZ | USMV | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | Apr 30, 2026 | Apr 30, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 100 | 170 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 21.1% | 15.6% |
| Largest position | QCOM 2.7% | CSCO 1.8% |
| Held alone | 66 positions, 61.2% | 136 positions, 80.1% |
| Covered by stock positions | 100% | 100% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In COWZ | In USMV | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| VZVerizon Communications Inc | 1.90% | 1.49% | 1.49% |
| MCKMcKesson Corp | 1.79% | 1.30% | 1.30% |
| NEMNewmont Corp | 1.93% | 1.18% | 1.18% |
| TMUST-Mobile US Inc | 1.78% | 1.16% | 1.16% |
| CORCencora Inc | 1.03% | 1.28% | 1.03% |
| TAT&T Inc | 1.84% | 0.99% | 0.99% |
| CLColgate-Palmolive Co | 1.10% | 0.89% | 0.89% |
| CRMSalesforce Inc | 1.76% | 0.88% | 0.88% |
| GILDGilead Sciences Inc | 1.83% | 0.82% | 0.82% |
| ROPRoper Technologies Inc | 0.78% | 0.93% | 0.78% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in COWZ
Only in USMV
Questions people ask
Is COWZ the same as USMV?
17.9% of their weight sits in the same 34 holdings. COWZ also reports MO, COP, CVS, which the other does not. USMV also reports CSCO, NVDA, EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between COWZ and USMV measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 100% of COWZ and 100% of USMV, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, USMV or COWZ?
COWZ reports 100 stock positions and USMV reports 170. 61.2% of COWZ's weight sits in names USMV does not hold, and 80.1% of USMV's weight in names COWZ does not hold. The ten largest positions are 21.1% of COWZ and 15.6% of USMV.
How do COWZ and USMV differ by sector?
The widest gap is Energy: COWZ has 15.2 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.