DFAC vs VTI overlap - what they share and where they differ
DFAC and VTI share 72.0% of their weight across 2,196 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
DFAC and VTI
72.0%
2,196 shared positions
DFAC
Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 2,313 positions · Jul 31, 2026
Top 10: 26.9%·Holdings of DFAC
VTI
VANGUARD TOTAL STOCK MARKET INDEX FUND
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 3,148 positions · Jun 30, 2026
Top 10: 33.4%·Holdings of VTI
Reported positions cover DFAC 100%, VTI 100% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
VTI vs DFAC side by side
DFACDimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF
2,313
stock positions reported to the SEC
2.1% of its weight is in 117 names VTI does not hold
VTIVANGUARD TOTAL STOCK MARKET INDEX FUND
3,148
stock positions reported to the SEC
4.4% of its weight is in 952 names DFAC does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Technology: VTI has 10.1 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| DFAC | VTI | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | Jul 31, 2026 | Jun 30, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 2,313 | 3,148 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 26.9% | 33.4% |
| Largest position | NVDA 5.3% | NVDA 6.4% |
| Held alone | 117 positions, 2.1% | 952 positions, 4.4% |
| Covered by stock positions | 100% | 100% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In DFAC | In VTI | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANVIDIA CORPORATION | 5.27% | 6.36% | 5.27% |
| AAPLAPPLE INC. | 5.12% | 5.87% | 5.12% |
| MSFTMICROSOFT CORPORATION | 4.41% | 3.83% | 3.83% |
| AMZNAMAZON.COM, INC. | 3.14% | 3.19% | 3.14% |
| GOOGLALPHABET INC. | 2.78% | 5.18% | 2.78% |
| METAMETA PLATFORMS, INC. | 1.73% | 1.71% | 1.71% |
| AVGOBROADCOM INC. | 1.18% | 2.47% | 1.18% |
| JPMJPMORGAN CHASE & CO. | 1.09% | 1.12% | 1.09% |
| MUMICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. | 1.09% | 1.80% | 1.09% |
| LLYELI LILLY AND COMPANY | 1.05% | 1.40% | 1.05% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in DFAC
Only in VTI
Questions people ask
Is DFAC the same as VTI?
72.0% of their weight sits in the same 2,196 holdings. DFAC also reports SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY, AON PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY, JOHNSON CONTROLS INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY, which the other does not. VTI also reports STX, WELL, PLD, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between DFAC and VTI measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 100% of DFAC and 100% of VTI, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, VTI or DFAC?
DFAC reports 2,313 stock positions and VTI reports 3,148. 2.1% of DFAC's weight sits in names VTI does not hold, and 4.4% of VTI's weight in names DFAC does not hold. The ten largest positions are 26.9% of DFAC and 33.4% of VTI.
How do DFAC and VTI differ by sector?
The widest gap is Technology: VTI has 10.1 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Other pairs with these funds
VTI against other funds in the table
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.