GSLC vs IVV overlap - what they share and where they differ
GSLC and IVV share 75.2% of their weight across 380 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
GSLC and IVV
75.2%
380 shared positions
GSLC
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta(R) U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 433 positions · May 31, 2026
Top 10: 37.2%·Holdings of GSLC
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 500 positions · Jun 30, 2026
Top 10: 37.8%·Holdings of IVV
Reported positions cover GSLC 100%, IVV 100% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
IVV vs GSLC side by side
GSLCGoldman Sachs ActiveBeta(R) U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
433
stock positions reported to the SEC
4.5% of its weight is in 53 names IVV does not hold
IVViShares Core S&P 500 ETF
500
stock positions reported to the SEC
4.9% of its weight is in 120 names GSLC does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Consumer Cyclical: GSLC has 1.3 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| GSLC | IVV | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | May 31, 2026 | Jun 30, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 433 | 500 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 37.2% | 37.8% |
| Largest position | NVDA 7.9% | NVDA 7.5% |
| Held alone | 53 positions, 4.5% | 120 positions, 4.9% |
| Covered by stock positions | 100% | 100% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In GSLC | In IVV | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANVIDIA CORP | 7.87% | 7.51% | 7.51% |
| AAPLAPPLE INC | 7.00% | 6.58% | 6.58% |
| GOOGLALPHABET INC | 5.19% | 5.83% | 5.19% |
| MSFTMICROSOFT CORP | 4.87% | 4.29% | 4.29% |
| AMZNAMAZON.COM INC | 3.78% | 3.61% | 3.61% |
| AVGOBROADCOM INC | 2.84% | 2.77% | 2.77% |
| METAMETA PLATFORMS INC | 2.14% | 1.92% | 1.92% |
| TSLATESLA INC | 1.28% | 1.83% | 1.28% |
| LLYELI LILLY & COMPANY | 1.17% | 1.47% | 1.17% |
| JPMJP MORGAN CHASE & COMPANY | 1.10% | 1.36% | 1.10% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in GSLC
Only in IVV
Questions people ask
Is GSLC the same as IVV?
75.2% of their weight sits in the same 380 holdings. GSLC also reports TEAM, NTRA, P, which the other does not. IVV also reports GS, SPGI, SBUX, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between GSLC and IVV measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 100% of GSLC and 100% of IVV, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, IVV or GSLC?
GSLC reports 433 stock positions and IVV reports 500. 4.5% of GSLC's weight sits in names IVV does not hold, and 4.9% of IVV's weight in names GSLC does not hold. The ten largest positions are 37.2% of GSLC and 37.8% of IVV.
How do GSLC and IVV differ by sector?
The widest gap is Consumer Cyclical: GSLC has 1.3 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Other pairs with these funds
IVV against other funds in the table
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.