IVV vs IWB overlap - what they share and where they differ
IVV and IWB share 91.3% of their weight across 489 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
IVV and IWB
91.3%
489 shared positions
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 500 positions · Jun 30, 2026
Top 10: 37.8%·Holdings of IVV
IWB
iShares Russell 1000 ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 1,011 positions · Jun 30, 2026
Top 10: 34.8%·Holdings of IWB
Reported positions cover IVV 100%, IWB 100% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
IWB vs IVV side by side
IVViShares Core S&P 500 ETF
500
stock positions reported to the SEC
1.0% of its weight is in 11 names IWB does not hold
IWBiShares Russell 1000 ETF
1,011
stock positions reported to the SEC
8.6% of its weight is in 522 names IVV does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Technology: IVV has 2.4 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| IVV | IWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | Jun 30, 2026 | Jun 30, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 500 | 1,011 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 37.8% | 34.8% |
| Largest position | NVDA 7.5% | NVDA 6.7% |
| Held alone | 11 positions, 1.0% | 522 positions, 8.6% |
| Covered by stock positions | 100% | 100% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In IVV | In IWB | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANVIDIA Corp. | 7.51% | 6.72% | 6.72% |
| AAPLApple, Inc. | 6.58% | 6.03% | 6.03% |
| GOOGLAlphabet, Inc. | 5.83% | 5.42% | 5.42% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp. | 4.29% | 3.99% | 3.99% |
| AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. | 3.61% | 3.33% | 3.33% |
| AVGOBroadcom, Inc. | 2.77% | 2.53% | 2.53% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 2.02% | 1.87% | 1.87% |
| METAMeta Platforms, Inc. | 1.92% | 1.78% | 1.78% |
| TSLATesla, Inc. | 1.83% | 1.77% | 1.77% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 1.47% | 1.38% | 1.38% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in IVV
Only in IWB
Questions people ask
Is IVV the same as IWB?
91.3% of their weight sits in the same 489 holdings. IVV also reports STX, JCI, ACN, which the other does not. IWB also reports JOHNSON CONTROLS INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY, SPCX, BE, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between IVV and IWB measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 100% of IVV and 100% of IWB, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, IWB or IVV?
IVV reports 500 stock positions and IWB reports 1,011. 1.0% of IVV's weight sits in names IWB does not hold, and 8.6% of IWB's weight in names IVV does not hold. The ten largest positions are 37.8% of IVV and 34.8% of IWB.
How do IVV and IWB differ by sector?
The widest gap is Technology: IVV has 2.4 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Other pairs with these funds
IVV against other funds in the table
IWB against other funds in the table
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.