IEMG vs VWO overlap - what they share and where they differ

IEMG and VWO share 65.8% of their weight across 1,709 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.

Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.

IEMG and VWO

65.8%

1,709 shared positions

IEMG

iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF

Reported positions cover 97% of the fund, 2,599 positions · Aug 31, 2026

Top 10: 33.3%·Holdings of IEMG

VWO

VANGUARD EMERGING MARKETS STOCK INDEX FUND

Reported positions cover 98% of the fund, 4,548 positions · Jul 31, 2026

Top 10: 27.5%·Holdings of VWO

Reported positions cover IEMG 97%, VWO 98% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.

VWO vs IEMG side by side

IEMGiShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF

2,599

stock positions reported to the SEC

29.2% of its weight is in 890 names VWO does not hold

VWOVANGUARD EMERGING MARKETS STOCK INDEX FUND

4,548

stock positions reported to the SEC

16.2% of its weight is in 2,839 names IEMG does not hold

Where each fund's weight sits

IEMG
VWO
shared with the other fundheld alonenot covered by the filing (cash, futures, bonds)

Largest sectors for both funds

Technology
22.4%
22.3%
Financial Services
3.8%
2.9%
Consumer Cyclical
1.4%
2.1%
Basic Materials
1.4%
0.9%
Industrials
0.0%
0.8%
Energy
0.6%
0.0%

No sector differs by more than a point between the two.

The figures side by side

IEMGVWO
Filing dateAug 31, 2026Jul 31, 2026
Stock positions reported2,5994,548
Weight of the ten largest33.3%27.5%
Largest positionTSM 13.2%TSM 15.6%
Held alone890 positions, 29.2%2,839 positions, 16.2%
Covered by stock positions97%98%

Holdings they share

StockIn IEMGIn VWOCounted
TSMTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited13.17%15.59%13.17%
TENCENT HOLDINGS LIMITED2.52%3.31%2.52%
BABAAlibaba Group Holding Limited1.70%2.41%1.70%
MEDIATEK INC.1.27%1.36%1.27%
DELTA ELECTRONICS, INC.0.80%0.82%0.80%
CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORPORATION0.74%0.92%0.74%
HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY CO., LTD.0.68%0.81%0.68%
HDBHDFC BANK LIMITED0.60%0.78%0.60%
RSRELIANCE POWER LIMITED0.58%0.81%0.58%
IBNICICI BANK LIMITED0.56%0.69%0.56%

What each holds alone

The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.

Only in IEMG

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.7.05%
SKHYSK hynix Inc.4.76%
PBRPetroleo Brasileiro S.A. (Petrobras)0.53%
SK SQUARE CO., LTD.0.49%
SAMSUNG ELECTRO-MECHANICS CO.,LTD0.42%
AL RAJHI BANKING AND INVESTMENT CORPORATION SJSC0.37%
KBKB Financial Group Inc.0.31%
HYUNDAI MOTOR COMPANY0.28%
SHGShinhan Financial Group Co., Ltd.0.24%
THE SAUDI NATIONAL BANK SJSC0.24%

Only in VWO

PDDPDD Holdings Inc0.59%
AL RAJHI BANK0.43%
PETROLEO BRASILEIRO SA0.32%
SAUDI NATIONAL BANK/THE0.26%
CAPITEC BANK HOLDINGS LTD0.22%
DELTA ELECTRONICS THAILAND PCL0.20%
FMXFomento Economico Mexicano SAB de CV0.19%
SAUDI TELECOM CO0.19%
MALAYAN BANKING BHD0.18%
SAUDI ARABIAN MINING CO0.18%

Questions people ask

Is IEMG the same as VWO?

65.8% of their weight sits in the same 1,709 holdings. IEMG also reports SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SKHY, PBR, which the other does not. VWO also reports PDD, AL RAJHI BANK, PETROLEO BRASILEIRO SA, which the other does not.

How is the overlap between IEMG and VWO measured?

For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 97% of IEMG and 98% of VWO, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.

Which holds more, VWO or IEMG?

IEMG reports 2,599 stock positions and VWO reports 4,548. 29.2% of IEMG's weight sits in names VWO does not hold, and 16.2% of VWO's weight in names IEMG does not hold. The ten largest positions are 33.3% of IEMG and 27.5% of VWO.

How do IEMG and VWO differ by sector?

No sector differs by more than a point between the two. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.

Where do the numbers come from?

From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.

Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs

Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.