IWP vs VB overlap - what they share and where they differ
IWP and VB share 21.4% of their weight across 179 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
IWP and VB
21.4%
179 shared positions
IWP
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 265 positions · Jun 30, 2026
Top 10: 19.7%·Holdings of IWP
VB
VANGUARD SMALL-CAP INDEX FUND
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 1,294 positions · Jun 30, 2026
Top 10: 4.3%·Holdings of VB
Reported positions cover IWP 100%, VB 100% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
VB vs IWP side by side
IWPiShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF
265
stock positions reported to the SEC
56.7% of its weight is in 86 names VB does not hold
VBVANGUARD SMALL-CAP INDEX FUND
1,294
stock positions reported to the SEC
72.7% of its weight is in 1,115 names IWP does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Technology: IWP has 18.0 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| IWP | VB | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | Jun 30, 2026 | Jun 30, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 265 | 1,294 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 19.7% | 4.3% |
| Largest position | DDOG 2.3% | CRDO 0.6% |
| Held alone | 86 positions, 56.7% | 1,115 positions, 72.7% |
| Covered by stock positions | 100% | 100% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In IWP | In VB | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| CRDOCredo Technology Group Holding Ltd. | 1.23% | 0.55% | 0.55% |
| JBLJabil, Inc. | 1.10% | 0.49% | 0.49% |
| RVMDRevolution Medicines, Inc. | 0.98% | 0.46% | 0.46% |
| ALABAstera Labs, Inc. | 2.02% | 0.45% | 0.45% |
| EMEEMCOR Group, Inc. | 1.00% | 0.45% | 0.45% |
| NTRANatera, Inc. | 1.01% | 0.45% | 0.45% |
| NRGNRG Energy, Inc. | 0.81% | 0.37% | 0.37% |
| CASYCasey's General Stores, Inc. | 0.71% | 0.36% | 0.36% |
| TPRTapestry, Inc. | 0.81% | 0.36% | 0.36% |
| CRSCarpenter Technology Corp. | 0.81% | 0.35% | 0.35% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in IWP
Only in VB
Questions people ask
Is IWP the same as VB?
21.4% of their weight sits in the same 179 holdings. IWP also reports DDOG, SNOW, NET, which the other does not. VB also reports FLEX, ATO, ILMN, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between IWP and VB measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 100% of IWP and 100% of VB, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, VB or IWP?
IWP reports 265 stock positions and VB reports 1,294. 56.7% of IWP's weight sits in names VB does not hold, and 72.7% of VB's weight in names IWP does not hold. The ten largest positions are 19.7% of IWP and 4.3% of VB.
How do IWP and VB differ by sector?
The widest gap is Technology: IWP has 18.0 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.