MCHI vs VWO overlap - what they share and where they differ
MCHI and VWO share 23.3% of their weight across 471 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
MCHI and VWO
23.3%
471 shared positions
MCHI
iShares MSCI China ETF
Reported positions cover 96% of the fund, 500 positions · Aug 31, 2026
Top 10: 42.0%·Holdings of MCHI
VWO
VANGUARD EMERGING MARKETS STOCK INDEX FUND
Reported positions cover 98% of the fund, 4,548 positions · Jul 31, 2026
Top 10: 27.5%·Holdings of VWO
Reported positions cover MCHI 96%, VWO 98% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
VWO vs MCHI side by side
MCHIiShares MSCI China ETF
500
stock positions reported to the SEC
3.0% of its weight is in 29 names VWO does not hold
VWOVANGUARD EMERGING MARKETS STOCK INDEX FUND
4,548
stock positions reported to the SEC
74.5% of its weight is in 4,077 names MCHI does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Technology: VWO has 7.3 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| MCHI | VWO | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | Aug 31, 2026 | Jul 31, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 500 | 4,548 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 42.0% | 27.5% |
| Largest position | TENCENT HOLDINGS LIMITED 13.9% | TSM 15.6% |
| Held alone | 29 positions, 3.0% | 4,077 positions, 74.5% |
| Covered by stock positions | 96% | 98% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In MCHI | In VWO | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| TENCENT HOLDINGS LIMITED | 13.93% | 3.31% | 3.31% |
| BABAAlibaba Group Holding Limited | 9.42% | 2.41% | 2.41% |
| CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORPORATION | 4.08% | 0.92% | 0.92% |
| INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL BANK OF CHINA LIMITED | 2.64% | 0.72% | 0.72% |
| SUGPSUNWODA ELECTRONIC CO., LTD | 0.64% | 0.61% | 0.61% |
| MEITUAN | 1.98% | 0.56% | 0.56% |
| XIAOMI CORPORATION | 2.37% | 0.55% | 0.55% |
| PING AN INSURANCE (GROUP) COMPANY OF CHINA, LTD. | 2.05% | 0.47% | 0.47% |
| BANK OF CHINA LIMITED | 2.07% | 0.43% | 0.43% |
| BYD COMPANY LIMITED | 1.77% | 0.43% | 0.43% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in MCHI
Only in VWO
Questions people ask
Is MCHI the same as VWO?
23.3% of their weight sits in the same 471 holdings. MCHI also reports LENOVO GROUP LIMITED, GUOTAI HAITONG SECURITIES CO., LTD., ZIJIN GOLD INTERNATIONAL CO LTD, which the other does not. VWO also reports TSM, MEDIATEK INC., DELTA ELECTRONICS, INC., which the other does not.
How is the overlap between MCHI and VWO measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 96% of MCHI and 98% of VWO, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, VWO or MCHI?
MCHI reports 500 stock positions and VWO reports 4,548. 3.0% of MCHI's weight sits in names VWO does not hold, and 74.5% of VWO's weight in names MCHI does not hold. The ten largest positions are 42.0% of MCHI and 27.5% of VWO.
How do MCHI and VWO differ by sector?
The widest gap is Technology: VWO has 7.3 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.