QQQ vs VGT overlap - what they share and where they differ
QQQ and VGT share 49.6% of their weight across 38 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
QQQ and VGT
49.6%
38 shared positions
QQQ
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 101 positions · Jun 30, 2026
Top 10: 47.8%·Holdings of QQQ
VGT
VANGUARD INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INDEX FUND
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 315 positions · May 31, 2026
Top 10: 59.4%·Holdings of VGT
Reported positions cover QQQ 100%, VGT 100% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
VGT vs QQQ side by side
QQQInvesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
101
stock positions reported to the SEC
42.5% of its weight is in 63 names VGT does not hold
VGTVANGUARD INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INDEX FUND
315
stock positions reported to the SEC
25.7% of its weight is in 277 names QQQ does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Technology: VGT has 23.8 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| QQQ | VGT | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | Jun 30, 2026 | May 31, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 101 | 315 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 47.8% | 59.4% |
| Largest position | NVDA 7.6% | NVDA 16.8% |
| Held alone | 63 positions, 42.5% | 277 positions, 25.7% |
| Covered by stock positions | 100% | 100% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In QQQ | In VGT | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANVIDIA Corp. | 7.60% | 16.82% | 7.60% |
| AAPLApple Inc. | 6.67% | 14.57% | 6.67% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp. | 4.35% | 9.46% | 4.35% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 5.64% | 4.20% | 4.20% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices, Inc. | 4.10% | 3.21% | 3.21% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc. | 2.81% | 4.21% | 2.81% |
| INTCIntel Corp. | 3.04% | 2.03% | 2.03% |
| CSCOCisco Systems, Inc. | 2.01% | 1.85% | 1.85% |
| LRCXLam Research Corp. | 2.35% | 1.56% | 1.56% |
| AMATApplied Materials, Inc. | 2.49% | 1.40% | 1.40% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in QQQ
Only in VGT
Questions people ask
Is QQQ the same as VGT?
49.6% of their weight sits in the same 38 holdings. QQQ also reports GOOGL, AMZN, TSLA, which the other does not. VGT also reports ORCL, IBM, SANDISK CORP/DE, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between QQQ and VGT measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 100% of QQQ and 100% of VGT, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, VGT or QQQ?
QQQ reports 101 stock positions and VGT reports 315. 42.5% of QQQ's weight sits in names VGT does not hold, and 25.7% of VGT's weight in names QQQ does not hold. The ten largest positions are 47.8% of QQQ and 59.4% of VGT.
How do QQQ and VGT differ by sector?
The widest gap is Technology: VGT has 23.8 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Other pairs with these funds
QQQ against other funds in the table
VGT against other funds in the table
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.