SCHA vs VBK overlap - what they share and where they differ
SCHA and VBK share 36.5% of their weight across 376 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
SCHA and VBK
36.5%
376 shared positions
SCHA
Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 1,552 positions · May 31, 2026
Top 10: 10.5%·Holdings of SCHA
VBK
VANGUARD SMALL-CAP GROWTH INDEX FUND
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 536 positions · Jun 30, 2026
Top 10: 9.3%·Holdings of VBK
Reported positions cover SCHA 100%, VBK 100% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
VBK vs SCHA side by side
SCHASchwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF
1,552
stock positions reported to the SEC
61.5% of its weight is in 1,176 names VBK does not hold
VBKVANGUARD SMALL-CAP GROWTH INDEX FUND
536
stock positions reported to the SEC
49.8% of its weight is in 160 names SCHA does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Technology: VBK has 14.3 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| SCHA | VBK | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | May 31, 2026 | Jun 30, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 1,552 | 536 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 10.5% | 9.3% |
| Largest position | SANDISK CORP/DE 5.3% | CRDO 1.3% |
| Held alone | 1,176 positions, 61.5% | 160 positions, 49.8% |
| Covered by stock positions | 100% | 100% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In SCHA | In VBK | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| RVMDRevolution Medicines Inc | 0.65% | 1.06% | 0.65% |
| STRLSterling Infrastructure Inc | 0.56% | 0.69% | 0.56% |
| ATIATI Inc | 0.50% | 0.76% | 0.50% |
| MTSIMACOM Technology Solutions Holdings Inc | 0.50% | 0.73% | 0.50% |
| NXTNextpower Inc | 0.49% | 0.48% | 0.48% |
| CDECoeur Mining Inc | 0.42% | 0.43% | 0.42% |
| MKSIMKS Inc | 0.46% | 0.42% | 0.42% |
| TTMITTM Technologies Inc | 0.38% | 0.55% | 0.38% |
| GHGuardant Health Inc | 0.35% | 0.53% | 0.35% |
| RMBSRambus Inc | 0.33% | 0.40% | 0.33% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in SCHA
Only in VBK
Questions people ask
Is SCHA the same as VBK?
36.5% of their weight sits in the same 376 holdings. SCHA also reports SANDISK CORP/DE, LITE, MLI, which the other does not. VBK also reports CRDO, ALAB, NTRA, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between SCHA and VBK measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 100% of SCHA and 100% of VBK, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, VBK or SCHA?
SCHA reports 1,552 stock positions and VBK reports 536. 61.5% of SCHA's weight sits in names VBK does not hold, and 49.8% of VBK's weight in names SCHA does not hold. The ten largest positions are 10.5% of SCHA and 9.3% of VBK.
How do SCHA and VBK differ by sector?
The widest gap is Technology: VBK has 14.3 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.