VHT vs XLV overlap - what they share and where they differ
VHT and XLV share 85.4% of their weight across 59 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
VHT and XLV
85.4%
59 shared positions
VHT
VANGUARD HEALTH CARE INDEX FUND
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 345 positions · May 31, 2026
Top 10: 51.9%·Holdings of VHT
XLV
State Street(R) Health Care Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 59 positions · Jun 30, 2026
Top 10: 61.6%·Holdings of XLV
Reported positions cover VHT 100%, XLV 100% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
XLV vs VHT side by side
VHTVANGUARD HEALTH CARE INDEX FUND
345
stock positions reported to the SEC
14.3% of its weight is in 286 names XLV does not hold
XLVState Street(R) Health Care Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
59
stock positions reported to the SEC
0.0% of its weight is in 0 names VHT does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
No sector differs by more than a point between the two.
The figures side by side
| VHT | XLV | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | May 31, 2026 | Jun 30, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 345 | 59 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 51.9% | 61.6% |
| Largest position | LLY 14.0% | LLY 16.5% |
| Held alone | 286 positions, 14.3% | 0 positions, 0.0% |
| Covered by stock positions | 100% | 100% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In VHT | In XLV | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| LLYEli Lilly & Co | 14.04% | 16.51% | 14.04% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson | 8.47% | 10.64% | 8.47% |
| ABBVAbbVie Inc | 6.09% | 7.74% | 6.09% |
| UNHUnitedHealth Group Inc | 5.45% | 6.57% | 5.45% |
| MRKMerck & Co Inc | 4.66% | 5.52% | 4.66% |
| TMOThermo Fisher Scientific Inc | 2.93% | 3.24% | 2.93% |
| AMGNAmgen Inc | 2.87% | 3.40% | 2.87% |
| GILDGilead Sciences Inc | 2.64% | 2.73% | 2.64% |
| ISRGIntuitive Surgical Inc | 2.38% | 2.45% | 2.38% |
| ABTAbbott Laboratories | 2.35% | 2.75% | 2.35% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in VHT
Only in XLV
Nothing among its reported positions that the others do not also hold.
Questions people ask
Is VHT the same as XLV?
85.4% of their weight sits in the same 59 holdings. VHT also reports ALNY, NTRA, RVMD, which the other does not. Among its reported positions, XLV holds nothing the other does not also hold.
How is the overlap between VHT and XLV measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 100% of VHT and 100% of XLV, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, XLV or VHT?
VHT reports 345 stock positions and XLV reports 59. 14.3% of VHT's weight sits in names XLV does not hold, and 0.0% of XLV's weight in names VHT does not hold. The ten largest positions are 51.9% of VHT and 61.6% of XLV.
How do VHT and XLV differ by sector?
No sector differs by more than a point between the two. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Other pairs with these funds
VHT against other funds in the table
XLV against other funds in the table
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.