VIG vs XLV overlap - what they share and where they differ
VIG and XLV share 16.3% of their weight across 22 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
VIG and XLV
16.3%
22 shared positions
VIG
VANGUARD DIVIDEND APPRECIATION INDEX FUND
Reported positions cover 99% of the fund, 309 positions · Apr 30, 2026
Top 10: 32.5%·Holdings of VIG
XLV
State Street(R) Health Care Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 59 positions · Jun 30, 2026
Top 10: 61.6%·Holdings of XLV
Reported positions cover VIG 99%, XLV 100% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
XLV vs VIG side by side
VIGVANGUARD DIVIDEND APPRECIATION INDEX FUND
309
stock positions reported to the SEC
83.2% of its weight is in 287 names XLV does not hold
XLVState Street(R) Health Care Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
59
stock positions reported to the SEC
29.5% of its weight is in 37 names VIG does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Healthcare: XLV has 75.8 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| VIG | XLV | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | Apr 30, 2026 | Jun 30, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 309 | 59 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 32.5% | 61.6% |
| Largest position | AVGO 5.2% | LLY 16.5% |
| Held alone | 287 positions, 83.2% | 37 positions, 29.5% |
| Covered by stock positions | 99% | 100% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In VIG | In XLV | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| LLYEli Lilly & Co | 3.34% | 16.51% | 3.34% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson | 2.49% | 10.64% | 2.49% |
| ABBVAbbVie Inc | 1.68% | 7.74% | 1.68% |
| UNHUnitedHealth Group Inc | 1.51% | 6.57% | 1.51% |
| MRKMerck & Co Inc | 1.22% | 5.52% | 1.22% |
| AMGNAmgen Inc | 0.84% | 3.40% | 0.84% |
| GILDGilead Sciences Inc | 0.73% | 2.73% | 0.73% |
| ABTAbbott Laboratories | 0.71% | 2.75% | 0.71% |
| DHRDanaher Corp | 0.51% | 2.09% | 0.51% |
| SYKStryker Corp | 0.49% | 1.89% | 0.49% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in VIG
Only in XLV
Questions people ask
Is VIG the same as XLV?
16.3% of their weight sits in the same 22 holdings. VIG also reports AVGO, AAPL, MSFT, which the other does not. XLV also reports TMO, ISRG, PFE, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between VIG and XLV measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 99% of VIG and 100% of XLV, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, XLV or VIG?
VIG reports 309 stock positions and XLV reports 59. 83.2% of VIG's weight sits in names XLV does not hold, and 29.5% of XLV's weight in names VIG does not hold. The ten largest positions are 32.5% of VIG and 61.6% of XLV.
How do VIG and XLV differ by sector?
The widest gap is Healthcare: XLV has 75.8 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Other pairs with these funds
XLV against other funds in the table
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.