IWB vs VT overlap - what they share and where they differ
IWB and VT share 59.5% of their weight across 980 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
IWB and VT
59.5%
980 shared positions
IWB
iShares Russell 1000 ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 1,011 positions · Jun 30, 2026
Top 10: 34.8%·Holdings of IWB
VT
VANGUARD TOTAL WORLD STOCK INDEX FUND
Reported positions cover 99% of the fund, 8,979 positions · Jul 31, 2026
Top 10: 22.3%·Holdings of VT
Reported positions cover IWB 100%, VT 99% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
VT vs IWB side by side
IWBiShares Russell 1000 ETF
1,011
stock positions reported to the SEC
0.7% of its weight is in 31 names VT does not hold
VTVANGUARD TOTAL WORLD STOCK INDEX FUND
8,979
stock positions reported to the SEC
39.3% of its weight is in 7,999 names IWB does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Technology: IWB has 13.3 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| IWB | VT | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | Jun 30, 2026 | Jul 31, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 1,011 | 8,979 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 34.8% | 22.3% |
| Largest position | NVDA 6.7% | NVDA 4.1% |
| Held alone | 31 positions, 0.7% | 7,999 positions, 39.3% |
| Covered by stock positions | 100% | 99% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In IWB | In VT | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANVIDIA CORPORATION | 6.72% | 4.06% | 4.06% |
| AAPLAPPLE INC. | 6.03% | 3.87% | 3.87% |
| GOOGLALPHABET INC. | 5.42% | 3.27% | 3.27% |
| MSFTMICROSOFT CORPORATION | 3.99% | 2.99% | 2.99% |
| AMZNAMAZON.COM, INC. | 3.33% | 2.28% | 2.28% |
| AVGOBROADCOM INC. | 2.53% | 1.57% | 1.57% |
| METAMETA PLATFORMS, INC. | 1.78% | 1.06% | 1.06% |
| BRK.ABERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC. | 1.34% | 0.81% | 0.81% |
| JPMJPMORGAN CHASE & CO. | 1.26% | 0.81% | 0.81% |
| MUMICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. | 1.87% | 0.80% | 0.80% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in IWB
Only in VT
Questions people ask
Is IWB the same as VT?
59.5% of their weight sits in the same 980 holdings. IWB also reports JOHNSON CONTROLS INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY, ACCENTURE PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY, AON PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY, which the other does not. VT also reports TSM, SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., ASML, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between IWB and VT measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 100% of IWB and 99% of VT, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, VT or IWB?
IWB reports 1,011 stock positions and VT reports 8,979. 0.7% of IWB's weight sits in names VT does not hold, and 39.3% of VT's weight in names IWB does not hold. The ten largest positions are 34.8% of IWB and 22.3% of VT.
How do IWB and VT differ by sector?
The widest gap is Technology: IWB has 13.3 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Other pairs with these funds
IWB against other funds in the table
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.